if i put light guage electric strings on my acoustic, what would happen?
#1
Posted 18 November 2004 - 08:30 PM
a friend of mine took and put electric strings on his acoustic, it sounds awesome, but i don't know what or how much damage will be done.
#4
Posted 19 November 2004 - 07:45 AM
never-was-plugged-in-to-begin-with.

John Jackson -My Teacher and My Old Friend
When the roll is called up yonder he'll be there
#6
Posted 19 November 2004 - 08:39 AM
Most acoustic strings are much cheaper than Elixirs... (you can buy them for the price of Slinkies, XL's or whatever) and (the following statement is a matter of my personal opinion) most cheap acoustic strings sound better than Elixirs.
New track - Mister Sandman
#7
Posted 19 November 2004 - 12:50 PM
Most acoustic strings are much cheaper than Elixirs... (you can buy them for the price of Slinkies, XL's or whatever) and (the following statement is a matter of my personal opinion) most cheap acoustic strings sound better than Elixirs.
I agree. The only benefit of using Elixirs is how long they last. They are merely a decent sounding string that lasts a long time. It really isn't cheaper to use them because of their longevity (assuming you change strings in a normal length of time). It just saves the time and trouble of doing so. I would never buy Elixirs based on their sound-quality.
never-was-plugged-in-to-begin-with.

John Jackson -My Teacher and My Old Friend
When the roll is called up yonder he'll be there
#8
Posted 19 November 2004 - 02:24 PM
Most acoustic strings are much cheaper than Elixirs... (you can buy them for the price of Slinkies, XL's or whatever) and (the following statement is a matter of my personal opinion) most cheap acoustic strings sound better than Elixirs.
I agree. The only benefit of using Elixirs is how long they last. They are merely a decent sounding string that lasts a long time. It really isn't cheaper to use them because of their longevity (assuming you change strings in a normal length of time). It just saves the time and trouble of doing so. I would never buy Elixirs based on their sound-quality.
I see your point very well... If I had about 60 guitars I'd do the same with those that I wouldn't pick every day.
New track - Mister Sandman
#9
Posted 19 November 2004 - 03:38 PM
Most acoustic strings are much cheaper than Elixirs... (you can buy them for the price of Slinkies, XL's or whatever) and (the following statement is a matter of my personal opinion) most cheap acoustic strings sound better than Elixirs.
I agree. The only benefit of using Elixirs is how long they last. They are merely a decent sounding string that lasts a long time. It really isn't cheaper to use them because of their longevity (assuming you change strings in a normal length of time). It just saves the time and trouble of doing so. I would never buy Elixirs based on their sound-quality.
I see your point very well... If I had about 60 guitars I'd do the same with those that I wouldn't pick every day.
Yes, those are the only guitars I put Elixirs on. Guitars I don't use very often but hate to bother changing strings when there might be only an hour or so of actual playing-time (or less) on them in a four or six month period.
never-was-plugged-in-to-begin-with.

John Jackson -My Teacher and My Old Friend
When the roll is called up yonder he'll be there
#10
Posted 19 November 2004 - 05:41 PM
Most acoustic strings are much cheaper than Elixirs... (you can buy them for the price of Slinkies, XL's or whatever) and (the following statement is a matter of my personal opinion) most cheap acoustic strings sound better than Elixirs.
I agree. The only benefit of using Elixirs is how long they last. They are merely a decent sounding string that lasts a long time. It really isn't cheaper to use them because of their longevity (assuming you change strings in a normal length of time). It just saves the time and trouble of doing so. I would never buy Elixirs based on their sound-quality.
I see your point very well... If I had about 60 guitars I'd do the same with those that I wouldn't pick every day.
Yes, those are the only guitars I put Elixirs on. Guitars I don't use very often but hate to bother changing strings when there might be only an hour or so of actual playing-time (or less) on them in a four or six month period.
i use elixirs.... but i'm a taylor man... elixirs are pretty much made for taylors... plus they have a smoother feel... less squeak, but that's really marginal.
i just hate changing and buying strings... being in university and having no money
#11
Posted 19 November 2004 - 06:27 PM

"No matter where you go, there you are" - Jethro Burns
#13
Posted 19 November 2004 - 08:25 PM
right now i have 13's on, the intonation is way off, the action if about a mile high but the sound is o.k. i reckon with a proper set up every thing would be grand- i just have other things to spend my money on right now
#14
Posted 21 November 2004 - 05:25 PM
#15
Posted 21 November 2004 - 05:51 PM
Most acoustic strings are much cheaper than Elixirs... (you can buy them for the price of Slinkies, XL's or whatever) and (the following statement is a matter of my personal opinion) most cheap acoustic strings sound better than Elixirs.
I agree. The only benefit of using Elixirs is how long they last. They are merely a decent sounding string that lasts a long time. It really isn't cheaper to use them because of their longevity (assuming you change strings in a normal length of time). It just saves the time and trouble of doing so. I would never buy Elixirs based on their sound-quality.
I see your point very well... If I had about 60 guitars I'd do the same with those that I wouldn't pick every day.
Yes, those are the only guitars I put Elixirs on. Guitars I don't use very often but hate to bother changing strings when there might be only an hour or so of actual playing-time (or less) on them in a four or six month period.
i use elixirs.... but i'm a taylor man... elixirs are pretty much made for taylors... plus they have a smoother feel... less squeak, but that's really marginal.
i just hate changing and buying strings... being in university and having no money
I use Elixirs on my Gibson J185, but it's all a matter of taste. I love the tone they give once I've worn them in a bit, and the only reason I stil with them is they last exceptionally long. I'm not a huge fan of changing strings...
#16
Posted 21 November 2004 - 06:27 PM
generally, 13's and 12's will be harder to play than 9's or 8's as you have to press them down more....they will also give a thicker tone.
that said i use 9's sometimes 10's with a 0.6mm pick, so it glides across nicely and the fact that i play blues means my strings and picks are more suited to it.
i have martin 9's on my acoustic and d'addario 10's on my electric, but i prefer the d'addario's they give a better sound in my opinion..
just chop and change until you find something you like
#17
Posted 23 November 2004 - 07:01 AM
a friend of mine took and put electric strings on his acoustic, it sounds awesome, but i don't know what or how much damage will be done.
No damage, but lower volume. The best bet for less finger wear and good sound would be something like Martin Bronze wound ultra-lights. If they hurt you need to play more often to keep the callouses built up.

Sign In
Register
Help
Add Reply

MultiQuote



