Epiphone Jumbo ej200 any knowledge?
#1
Posted 25 November 2008 - 10:54 AM
cheers
#2
Posted 25 November 2008 - 04:17 PM
I cant comment about that particular model, but the epi hummingbird i played was (to be frank) cr@p. It felt okay in the hands, but sounded like utter poop. And i MEAN utter poop. As such, i have no confidence in epi acoustics, though im a big fan of their (korean) electrics.
Hell, I got 5 Major-Points™
#3
Posted 25 November 2008 - 04:21 PM
The fact that it is a jumbo may make up for some lack of projection and tone but a Taylor 514, which is a Ovangkol back and side w/ a spruce top being only a Grand Auditorium sized guitar will still sound better than a laminate Jumbo.
If you can just hold out and add another few hundred that you can spend, look into the Masterbuilt Series from Epiphone. They are probably the best bang for your buck for an all solid wood guitar.
Also check out Tacoma guitars. they have a laminate sides but the top and back are solid wood and gives a decent tone.
This post has been edited by ninjato: 25 November 2008 - 04:22 PM
#4
Posted 25 November 2008 - 04:52 PM
The fact that it is a jumbo may make up for some lack of projection and tone but a Taylor 514, which is a Ovangkol back and side w/ a spruce top being only a Grand Auditorium sized guitar will still sound better than a laminate Jumbo.
[color=red]Also check out Tacoma guitars. they have a laminate sides but the top and back are solid wood and gives a decent tone.
I agree with both statements. Epi's Masterbilt series is far superior to the "regular" Epiphones. And also (for the money) I think Tacoma offers pretty decent guitars. Between the Epi Masterbilt and Tacoma I would however prefer the Masterbilt.
Most jumbos have a more powerful bass than smaller-bodies guitars. As far as the action, that all depends on how it is set up. (Most factory-setups aren't that great, if they even to bother setting it up at all.) The action can be set up as low as you like it, given the straightness of the neck, craftsmanship, etc. Most guitars bought right from the store (or wherever) can have their action improved quite a bit with a good set up.
(Also, for the money the Yamaha FG700-SB isn't a bad guitar. If you can find one. The Alvarez AJ60 (Advanced Jumbo 60) is also pretty decent (costs more than the FG-700). Still, the best of all the above is probably an Epi Masterbilt.)
never-was-plugged-in-to-begin-with.

John Jackson -My Teacher and My Old Friend
When the roll is called up yonder he'll be there
#5
Posted 30 November 2008 - 11:32 AM
The fact that it is a jumbo may make up for some lack of projection and tone but a Taylor 514, which is a Ovangkol back and side w/ a spruce top being only a Grand Auditorium sized guitar will still sound better than a laminate Jumbo.
[color=red]Also check out Tacoma guitars. they have a laminate sides but the top and back are solid wood and gives a decent tone.
I agree with both statements. Epi's Masterbilt series is far superior to the "regular" Epiphones. And also (for the money) I think Tacoma offers pretty decent guitars. Between the Epi Masterbilt and Tacoma I would however prefer the Masterbilt.
Most jumbos have a more powerful bass than smaller-bodies guitars. As far as the action, that all depends on how it is set up. (Most factory-setups aren't that great, if they even to bother setting it up at all.) The action can be set up as low as you like it, given the straightness of the neck, craftsmanship, etc. Most guitars bought right from the store (or wherever) can have their action improved quite a bit with a good set up.
(Also, for the money the Yamaha FG700-SB isn't a bad guitar. If you can find one. The Alvarez AJ60 (Advanced Jumbo 60) is also pretty decent (costs more than the FG-700). Still, the best of all the above is probably an Epi Masterbilt.)
Another thing people make a huge mistake is that although you may like Jumbo's, many get Jumbos and the wonder why it doesn't sound right to them. I've seen many players get a Jumbo, then immediately change the strings from the .12 or .13 and take it down to .10's..... .10s will not have the power to move the top of a Jumbo so consequently they get a thin sound. Jumbo's are exactly that...everything is jumbofied so it takes a little more effort to play them but for me, the tonal quality of a Jumbo is hwat my ears "lust" for.
#6
Posted 06 December 2008 - 04:16 PM
IMO the best mid range solid woods guitar you can get, the one I played (and am currently saving for) is perfect to play and sounds amazing

#7
Posted 08 December 2008 - 09:54 AM
IMO the best mid range solid woods guitar you can get, the one I played (and am currently saving for) is perfect to play and sounds amazing
That looks like a great price on a solid wood guitar.
#8
Posted 11 December 2008 - 11:54 AM
John.
#9
Posted 11 December 2008 - 05:00 PM
never-was-plugged-in-to-begin-with.

John Jackson -My Teacher and My Old Friend
When the roll is called up yonder he'll be there
#10
Posted 12 December 2008 - 06:11 AM
JOHN.
#11
Posted 12 December 2008 - 09:51 AM
Also keep in mind, what the player hears when they play is a lot different than what people sitting 10 feet away are hearing. This is where the more expensive/better made guitar will "outplay" the laminate.
If you plug in, all bets are off...it's no longer the guitar but the quality of the preamp for the most part and high end guitars tend to feedback easier than cheaper guitars when plugged in. Just my experience.
This post has been edited by ninjato: 12 December 2008 - 09:53 AM

Sign In
Register
Help
Add Reply

MultiQuote



