saw that we need more topics, so here's one. does the type of wood really make a big difference in the sound of an acoustic? if so, what are the best types of wood. i know that mine is made of dao wood from asia, and it gives it a great midrange tone. and martin uses rock from the mountains in montana, or n.d., or where ever the hell their based (
wood???? does it really matter???
#1
Posted 06 November 2003 - 10:44 PM
saw that we need more topics, so here's one. does the type of wood really make a big difference in the sound of an acoustic? if so, what are the best types of wood. i know that mine is made of dao wood from asia, and it gives it a great midrange tone. and martin uses rock from the mountains in montana, or n.d., or where ever the hell their based (

yeah, he's that cool
#2
Posted 07 November 2003 - 01:51 AM
Superwinkie Theme Song -- a la brokenmirror

We have no great war, no great depression. Our great war is a spiritual war. Our great depression is our lives.
Very proud holder of 1 Major-Point
#4
Posted 07 November 2003 - 02:18 AM
okay,so this has nothing to do with acoustics,bustill,it's not off topic.
This post has been edited by Bad Horsie Dude: 07 November 2003 - 02:20 AM
#6
Posted 07 November 2003 - 09:38 AM
Spruce is only used for soundboards you wouldnt use it for back and ribs the same as you wouldnt have a rose wood soundboard.
Soundboards are only really spruce or ceder.Back and ribs can be any number of different hard woods.All would produce different sounds.Brazilian rose wood is widely considered to be the best of all tone woods but its very rare and expencive.Finding a good batch is difficult.But like already mentioned it down to what you like at the end of the day.Woods like maple sond brighter and woods like rose wood and koa warmer.Other things also affect the sound the thickness of the woods and strutting patterns for example.
#7
Posted 07 November 2003 - 10:46 AM
The key to good sound is getting the most energy possible out of a vibrateing body. wood has been the best and cheapest way to do this to date. However, thanks to top secret goverment research, whole new classes of suitable aero-space materials are soon going to make for some amazing guitars!
Alot of credit also has to go to acoustic enginers for creating sound boxes that fully make use of space avaliable.
Then too there's a whole lot of guys like me making saw dust in their garages hopeing to improve the art of luthiery in some small way.
(never going to happen, but I can hope.)
#8
Posted 07 November 2003 - 10:50 AM
never-was-plugged-in-to-begin-with.

John Jackson -My Teacher and My Old Friend
When the roll is called up yonder he'll be there
#9
Posted 07 November 2003 - 10:53 AM
saw that we need more topics, so here's one. does the type of wood really make a big difference in the sound of an acoustic? if so, what are the best types of wood. i know that mine is made of dao wood from asia, and it gives it a great midrange tone. and martin uses rock from the mountains in montana, or n.d., or where ever the hell their based (
No, it doesn't matter. Just go get some partical board and make yourself a new guitar.
#13
Posted 07 November 2003 - 04:45 PM
sitka spruce
engelmann spruce
hawaiian koa
walnut (i don't know why)
ovangkol
and there's others, but i don't really see a point in naming EVERY ONE of them
as for backs it's kinda limited
mostly rosewood
mahogany
laminate (unfortunate)
koa
...there's others too
necks are mostly
ebony
maple
rosewood
martin uses some synthetic stuff on their x series too
fretless basses are usually made with 'pao ferro' (whatever the hell that means)
#14
Posted 07 November 2003 - 04:51 PM
sitka spruce
engelmann spruce
hawaiian koa
walnut (i don't know why)
ovangkol
and there's others, but i don't really see a point in naming EVERY ONE of them
as for backs it's kinda limited
mostly rosewood
mahogany
laminate (unfortunate)
koa
...there's others too
necks are mostly
ebony
maple
rosewood
martin uses some synthetic stuff on their x series too
fretless basses are usually made with 'pao ferro' (whatever the hell that means)
Theres far more woods for backs and ribs than sound boards.Ive never known anyone to use Walnut or koa as a soundboard though i know LMI do sell koa tops.Ive never played a guitar with one though and certainly wouldnt choose a hard wood like that to build a guitar myself.
Dont you mean finger boards rather than necks aswell.An ebony neck would be quite heavy and quite expensive.I recently played a telly made entirly from ebony and it was the heavyest guitar ive ever played it was far too heavy.
This post has been edited by adds: 07 November 2003 - 04:54 PM
#15
Posted 07 November 2003 - 05:03 PM
Taylor made a guitar out of 2x4's and an oak pallet
pallet guitar
#16
Posted 07 November 2003 - 08:02 PM
sitka spruce
engelmann spruce
hawaiian koa
walnut (i don't know why)
ovangkol
and there's others, but i don't really see a point in naming EVERY ONE of them
as for backs it's kinda limited
mostly rosewood
mahogany
laminate (unfortunate)
koa
...there's others too
necks are mostly
ebony
maple
rosewood
martin uses some synthetic stuff on their x series too
fretless basses are usually made with 'pao ferro' (whatever the hell that means)
Theres far more woods for backs and ribs than sound boards.Ive never known anyone to use Walnut or koa as a soundboard though i know LMI do sell koa tops.Ive never played a guitar with one though and certainly wouldnt choose a hard wood like that to build a guitar myself.
Dont you mean finger boards rather than necks aswell.An ebony neck would be quite heavy and quite expensive.I recently played a telly made entirly from ebony and it was the heavyest guitar ive ever played it was far too heavy.
oops. ya i forgot about fretboards, well that's what you get from a half-assed job.

Sign In
Register
Help
Add Reply


MultiQuote


