aging taylors anyone know????
#1
Posted 13 April 2004 - 12:45 PM
but to help add things to the list, yes i'm still looking, probably will be for another 6 months to a year, because i want a great guitar, and i want to spend as much time looking for it as possible.
anyway, i am looking for a guitar that will age very well, and i think i'm gonna bump the price range up to $1,000 to $2,000. i'll be willing to go a little higher or lower if i find something outside of that range.
so just wondering what guitars age very well?

yeah, he's that cool
#2
Posted 13 April 2004 - 04:47 PM
#3
Posted 13 April 2004 - 06:41 PM
ya my 310 from 2002 is opening up nicely (tonally, not physically
#5
Posted 14 April 2004 - 12:20 AM
taylor started up in '71 so it's not that likely that you'll find a 30 year old taylor, there are only about 100 or so from the first four years... three from the first year, so they are insanely hard to come by, but the build quality is phenominal, 100% hand built.
#7
Posted 15 April 2004 - 09:31 AM
#8
Posted 15 April 2004 - 12:19 PM
The challenge that Taylor undertook was to outsell Martin. To do so they have had to come up with some pretty clever manufacturing concepts and innovations. Personally I am not a believer in what Taylor does. I prefer my guitars to mellow with age. I prefer my guitars to have a little more bottom end and soul. I am not a Martin person (too traditional) but I would sooner own a Martin than a Taylor.
In fact, a good customer of mine who owns a very expensive model Taylor guitar recently told me that his top of the line model sounded OK when he was playing on stage. At home or In the studio however it sounded like the high hat. I couldn't have put it better if I tried. This person was actually given his guitar by Taylor (He is a celebrity) asked me not to use his name in print because he didn't want to seem ungrateful to them for giving him the guitar.
Remember the vast majority of guitar buyers have untrained ears and they don't really know what to look for. I'll bet that 85% of the people who buy Taylor Guitars would fall into that category. Several years ago Taylor did some Brazilian Rosewood models that I sold in the $4,500.00 price range. They were the best Taylor's I have ever sold. However the Tacoma Amazon eats it for lunch. The only other acoustic guitar I consistently like is the Larrivee.
- Ed Roman
Of course, if you like your Taylor then thats fine. I happen to like the Taylors I have played but as I have never owned one, I cannot be sure of how well they age. Taylor are completly machine made which isn't technically a bad thing but their finishing process takes less than a minute, 40 layers of hand buffed pro-ageing nitrocellulose liquor it is not. Anyway eetdrinkandbemerry gives some personal insight into the Taylor guitar, which I find interesting.
On a side note, I would love to own this Taylor:
This post has been edited by nnyrad: 15 April 2004 - 12:20 PM
#9
Posted 15 April 2004 - 12:39 PM
This post has been edited by annoying_2001: 15 April 2004 - 12:40 PM

yeah, he's that cool
#10
Posted 15 April 2004 - 01:40 PM
#11
Posted 15 April 2004 - 09:04 PM
that was actually a quote of a well known guitar dealer in Las Vegas... his name is Ed Roman. i find him to be a tightass about everything. he seems to think that only guitars made of 100% american parts, by american companies, in america, by americans are good guitars... everything else to him is rubbish... if a machine touches it, to him it has "no soul" to it.
i mean honestly a little production never hurt anyone (well maybe in a few rare cases where the guitars itself breaks) i'm not saying that you should go out and buy les paul knockoff because it's almost as good as a real one. just that it doesn't have to be french polished and hand sanded to look nice.
#13
Posted 16 April 2004 - 10:01 AM
I was just wondering what it is that makes it get better with time? I am assuming that it the aging of the wood, maybe it drying out some....is that right? If so, would more southern climates' guitars age quicker(sound wise)? That could be the reason why more southern climates are filled with acoustics...compared to us northerns
T^roy

Imagination is more powerful than any knowledge-Einstein
GTU Member of the week July 19, 2004, 875 posts
There is a fine line between insanity and genius and I think i crossed it...but what side I am on is still unclear.
#14
Posted 16 April 2004 - 01:04 PM
I was just wondering what it is that makes it get better with time? I am assuming that it the aging of the wood, maybe it drying out some....is that right? If so, would more southern climates' guitars age quicker(sound wise)? That could be the reason why more southern climates are filled with acoustics...compared to us northerns
T^roy
well generally the further north you get the less acoustics are around for that reason, there's little humidity, low temperatures, which makes for crappy playing, so you can't really sit on the porch and play that much.
but the aging thing has to do with how much it gets played. a '34 gibson jumbo (like dadfad's) probably sounds incredible on account of how often it's played. but i bet a '34 gibson jumbo that's been in an attic since '35 won't sound as good (but amazing no less). aging also, like you said is caused by the wood drying out and the finish thinning. allowing for a more open response in sound.
#15
Posted 17 April 2004 - 10:32 AM
I was just wondering what it is that makes it get better with time? I am assuming that it the aging of the wood, maybe it drying out some....is that right? If so, would more southern climates' guitars age quicker(sound wise)? That could be the reason why more southern climates are filled with acoustics...compared to us northerns
T^roy
well generally the further north you get the less acoustics are around for that reason, there's little humidity, low temperatures, which makes for crappy playing, so you can't really sit on the porch and play that much.
but the aging thing has to do with how much it gets played. a '34 gibson jumbo (like dadfad's) probably sounds incredible on account of how often it's played. but i bet a '34 gibson jumbo that's been in an attic since '35 won't sound as good (but amazing no less). aging also, like you said is caused by the wood drying out and the finish thinning. allowing for a more open response in sound.
It's nice that some people don't have humidity....here in the mid-west, I'd argue about it being humid more often than not, well during the summer/spring months.
Well it's awesome that guitars change tune over time, almost makes me wish i could have found a nice older used guitar, but I didn't know of any good places to get one.
T^roy

Imagination is more powerful than any knowledge-Einstein
GTU Member of the week July 19, 2004, 875 posts
There is a fine line between insanity and genius and I think i crossed it...but what side I am on is still unclear.
#17
Posted 18 April 2004 - 12:37 PM
This post has been edited by annoying_2001: 18 April 2004 - 06:04 PM

yeah, he's that cool

Sign In
Register
Help
Add Reply


MultiQuote

[IMG]